Enterprise AI, from proof of concept to daily use.
I get enterprise AI through security review and into work people own: a signed-off design, a named owner, measured results, and a gate that says it still works. By day I lead AI transformation at monday.com as a Senior Forward Deployed Consultant. Outside it, I work with a few teams at a time, and I run my own AI lab under the same rules.
What I do for teams.
The demo was never the hard part. These four habits get a deployment through security review and keep it in daily use.
-
Design sign-off before the first demo
Data flow, access scoping, retention terms, and failure modes written down before security sees a demo. The design sign-off, typically the CISO’s, then reviews a written design instead of a slide.
-
A named owner per workflow
One person, not a committee. When output quality drops or the workflow has to change, there is one name on it, the same as the payroll run.
-
Measured before and after
Minutes per ticket, error rate, rework, escalations. If the workflow was not measured before the model arrived, nobody can claim it improved.
-
A gate that fails in CI, not in front of a customer
A golden dataset and a judge model score the live system, and the build fails when quality drifts.
I built these habits over twelve years of enterprise rollouts at Infosys Consulting, OneTrust, and AuditBoard (now Optro). At AuditBoard, every generative AI deployment went through a design sign-off and closed only when the customer confirmed adoption.
Frontier models plan, local models run, code decides.
I run my own AI under the rules above: the criteria are written down before the work starts, results are measured, and a gate, not a model, decides what counts. Here is one job moving through my lab.
-
Plan
Frontier · Claude, GPT
Splits the job into bounded pieces and writes down what done means before anything runs.
591 problems in the test written before a 17% decode speedup was allowed to ship; it showed no quality loss
-
Run
Local · GX10 pair, Mac Studio
The pieces run in parallel on hardware I own: GLM 5.3 Flash on the GX10 pair and a Qwen3.8 27B on the Mac Studio.
36 of 36 sealed holdout coding runs passed by the 27B on the Mac Studio: 12 tasks, 3 rounds each
-
Check
Code, then frontier
Code checks each result against the criteria; failures fall back to a cloud model. A frontier model judges a sample. Nothing counts until both pass.
24 fallbacks to a cloud model out of about 38,000 local requests, last 30 days
Lab ledger, as of
- 1,930,220,770 tokens through models on hardware I own, prompt and generated, on record through
- 35,549,565 of them generated
From the lab’s usage logs, each request counted once. Local runs include benchmark work.
Start here.
Three posts for teams moving AI from proof of concept to daily use. The lab notes are in the full list. All writing
-
The missing 90 percent of AI adoption
73% of surveyed enterprises use AI but only 10% run on it. Missing ownership, sign-off paths, and measured workflows create the gap; the models are fine
-
Routing work between local and cloud
Model rankings churn monthly; a routing policy survives. Classify LLM workloads by risk, privacy, latency, and volume, and keep the decision log.
-
The week the cloud blinked
Fable 5 vanished for 18 days under an export-control order. Frontier model access is now a dependency risk you have to engineer against
If your AI work is stuck at proof of concept, that is the job I do.
A short scoping brief on what you are rolling out and what stands in the way. It comes straight to me, I read every one myself, and the first call starts at the real problem.